Willow Flat Revegetation

2000 Stems
Planted

trees, shrubs, groundcovers

ACT PCS
Client

government conservation

6 mo+ Visible recruitment

acacias returning on site

Catchment Landscape role

cotter water supply lands

Project snapshot

Project Name

Willow Flat Revegetation

Client

Parks Conservation Service (PCS), ACT Government

Land / Country

Lower Cotter Catchment, approximately 5 km south-west of Cotter Dam, ACT. Ngunnawal Country.

Sector

Government — catchment restoration / former pine plantation conversion

Year delivered

Planting campaign 2022–2023, with follow-up site walk-through April 2023

Project aim

Re-establish a diverse native plant community on a floodplain formerly under pine forest, so the site can function as habitat and contribute to catchment health rather than remaining a weed-dominated clearing.

Scale

Targeted floodplain / riparian planting zones within the Lower Cotter restoration estate

Stems planted

2,000 trees, shrubs and groundcovers installed under the PCS contract

Lead

Regenerative Landscapes Australia — on-ground delivery and adaptive site reading

The site

Willow Flat sits on an old pine-forest floodplain

After harvest and years of disturbance the ground had been colonised by dense blackberry, with native raspberry and scattered remnant natives in the mix. Forest mulching opened planting lanes. The soil still carried the acidic signature of a pine site — a condition blackberry exploits, and one that native pioneers (especially acacias) will occupy once light and space return.
The brief was not “replace pine with a tidy plantation.” It was to plant a mixed native community into a living, weedy, recruiting system and then read how the site responded. That distinction matters to future clients: RLA treats weeds as part of the successional conversation, not only as a defect to spray out.

Aim, in the client’s terms

Install 2,000 locally appropriate trees, shrubs and groundcovers to specification.

Work around existing recruitment rather than flattening the whole successional response.

Leave the site able to keep regenerating — habitat function for a diverse suite of species, not a single canopy crop.

Demonstrate to PCS that a regenerative contractor can deliver government stems-in-the-ground work and still think like an ecologist on site.

What we delivered

Contract planting of 2,000 trees, shrubs and groundcovers across prepared lanes.

Tree-guarding where browse and microclimate required it — guards used as a growth aid, not as decoration.

On-site reading of blackberry / native raspberry mosaics so planting did not fight the recruitment already underway.

Follow-up walk-through (April 2023) documenting natural acacia recruitment in mulched blackberry zones within six months — evidence that the site was doing part of the work.

Practical briefing for the client on organic regeneration versus design-led planting, so PCS staff could see why both were present on the same flat.

Species logic followed catchment practice for the Lower Cotter: a mixed native palette of canopy eucalypts and casuarinas suited to the local woodland/forest types, nitrogen-fixing acacias as pioneers, and a shrub/groundcover layer for structure. Final species lists should be attached from the PCS packing slips before this sheet is issued externally.

Outcomes

Planting delivered

2,000 stems installed to the PCS brief on a constrained, weedy floodplain.

Natural recruitment

Acacias and other natives germinating in mulched blackberry within ~6 months — the site was not a dead canvas.

Method

Guards, lane planting and successional reading rather than wall-to-wall chemical wipe and monoculture rows.

Client type proven

ACT Government conservation agency. Useful when a new council or state agency asks “have you worked inside a public land system?”

Landscape context

Work sits inside the broader Lower Cotter catchment repair effort (water quality, pine conversion, habitat). RLA can operate as a specialist crew inside a larger public program.

Communication

Site video and walk-through used as a living report — useful for time-poor agency managers.

Capacity this project proves

A single 2,000-stem government job is not a 50-hectare farm retrofit. It does prove the parts of the business that many new clients actually buy

We can contract to a government conservation agency and deliver stems to a specification.

We can work former plantation / floodplain ground with a serious weed load and still plant into it.

We leave a monitoring trail (walk-through, photo record, narrative of recruitment) rather than disappearing after invoice.

We can sit inside a larger catchment program without needing to own the whole landscape.

Crew, logistics and plant handling are already set up for public-land access, biosecurity and seasonal windows.

What we would add on a repeat job

To make the next Willow Flat-type brief even more useful as a published case study, lock these at contract start

Exact contract value and variations

Hectares treated and stems per hectare, not only a total count.

Survival audit at 6 and 18 months, with a simple traffic-light map.

Species list and provenance attached as an appendix.

One client quote and two dated photo pairs (at planting / at first summer).